British House of Commons MPs moot Zimbabwe bailout

File photo dated 16/07/14 of a general view of the Commons during Prime Minister's Questions in the House of Commons, London as it is a reminder to Scots that they are being governed by "Tory-led governments people in Scotland don't vote for", according to Scottish Finance Secretary John Swinney.
Spread the love

ZIMBABWE’s commitment to mend diplomatic and political ties with the United Kingdom has attracted a growing constituency in the British legislature with some parliamentarians asking the Conservative government to soften its hardline stance and extend a financial rescue package to Harare.

Further debate in the House of Lords also triggered sentiments that the Britain government needed to reflect on the economic sanctions regime on Zimbabwe as it is hurting innocent people.

Liberal Democratic member Jonathan Oates (Baron Oates) last week asked London to consider facilitating an international financial bailout package for Zimbabwe in return for enhanced economic and political reforms by Harare.

He also asked the British government to weigh the option of collaborating with the European Union and the United States to tie up a financial package for Harare modelled along the post-World War II Marshall Plan.

The Marshall Plan, also known as the European Recovery Programme (ERP), was a US-funded reconstruction bailout handed to Western Europe following the World War 2 devastation.

The brainchild of then US Secretary of State George Marshall, after whom it was named, it provided more than US$15 billion to help finance rebuilding efforts in the EU.

Authorities in Harare say they would welcome such a package, as long as it does not compromise national interests.

Posing a question during last week’s Question and Answer session in the House of Lords, Lord Oates asked for a similar reconstruction programme for Zimbabwe, which is tied to specified reform  criteria.

Acknowledging the impact of climate change on Zimbabwe’s food security and general state of the economy, Lord Oates said London should consider facilitating a bailout  for Zimbabwe.

“As he will be aware, the situation in Zimbabwe is now absolutely desperate,” said Lord Oates.

“Does the minister agree that, in addition to the restrictive measures against individuals who (are alleged to) abuse human rights and continue to loot the country, we also need a positive offer to give hope to the Zimbabwean people in their struggle for political and economic justice?

“Will the government, therefore, work with our European and other international partners to agree on an economic rescue package — a Marshall Plan — that would be made available to any Zimbabwean government who met specified criteria.”

Responding to the question, Deputy Leader of the House, Frederick Richard Penn Curzon (Lord Howe) also acknowledged the need for such a bailout.

“My Lords, I acknowledge the noble Lord’s longstanding and close interest in Zimbabwe and its people, and I agree that we must continue to give hope and encouragement to all those who want to see genuine political and economic change in Zimbabwe,” said Lord Howe.

“However, we have to face the reality that no package of external support will deliver for the Zimbabwean people without fundamental reforms, as he rightly says.

“Therefore, the onus must remain on the Government of that country to demonstrate true commitment to change.”

Contributing to the debate, David Howell (Baron Howell) of Guildford asked his government to investigate how sanctions imposed by the EU and the US are “making the food situation even worse” in Zimbabwe.

“Could my noble friend say a little more about the workings of EU and American sanctions, which, as the noble Lord, Lord Collins, just pointed out, are being increased at the moment?,” asked Lord Howell.

“I know the intention is that they should hit entities and officials, and maybe they are doing so, but there are suggestions that one outcome is that this is making the food situation even worse for many innocent people.

“Can he explain how sanctions are working and whether we are satisfied with how they are operating?”

In response, Lord Howe said the UK would review its position on sanctioning Zimbabwe at the end of the year.

The development comes as Government is accelerating the implementation of political and electoral legislative reforms, to further entrench democracy and personal freedoms.

An Inter-Ministerial Taskforce on Political, Electoral and Legislative Reforms set up last year and chaired by Justice, Legal and Parliamentary Affairs Minister Ziyambi Ziyambi is fast-tracking sweeping legislative changes to replace laws considered repressive or anti-business in an audacious bid by authorities to entrench democracy and a business-friendly environment.

Most of the new laws are expected to be either in place or before Parliament by June.

Foreign Affairs and International Trade Deputy Minister David Musabayana told The Sunday Mail that there was a growing constituency within the British establishment that is open to normalising relations with Zimbabwe.

“We are amenable to such an undertaking (the proposed bailout),” said Deputy bMinister Musabayana.

“This is the whole essence of re-engagement where we are looking for strategic partners who are willing to assist in areas of need.

“As you know, the reason why we are in the situation that we are in right now is because of legacy issues; where the Lancaster House Conference had made an undertaking that the British were going to provide about £1 billion towards land reform, but there was a change of government between the Conservatives and the Labour Party, which came into power and refused to honour that agreement.

“Even the US had pledged to provide around US$75 million a year towards the Land Reform Programme, again that was never released.

“So, those are some of the gaps that were created. Like we always say, re-engagement is a process. I think there is a constituency within the British establishment that has realised the need (to assist) and have realised the reforms that we are undertaking.

“But beyond reform, we also need financial packages. So as Government as long as it is a financial package that goes towards development and is without any strings attached and does not compromise the national interest of Zimbabwe, we are amenable to that.”

Harare has long insisted on its commitment to political and economic reforms, pointing out that reform was a process and not an event.

Last week, Minister Ziyambi told The Sunday Mail that Government cannot “short circuit” legislative processes.