A fresh debate has emerged over the role of Zimbabwe’s main opposition leader, Nelson Chamisa, in the country’s volatile political landscape, with renewed scrutiny on his political evolution and shifting alliances.
By NewsHawks Reporter
Australian-based Zimbabwean political analyst Reason Wafawarova has weighed in on the discussion, providing a detailed assessment of Chamisa’s political journey—from his firebrand activism days as a student leader to his current position in the opposition.
Justice Alfred Mavedzenge’s analysis, cited by Wafawarova, suggests that Chamisa has undergone a significant transformation over the years. Once known for his bold and fearless stance as a student leader in the Zimbabwe National Students Union (ZINASU), Chamisa’s trajectory shifted upon entering mainstream politics with the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) in 1999.
Wafawarova claims that Chamisa’s tenure as the Minister of ICTs in the Government of National Unity (GNU) from 2009 to 2013 marked a turning point. He alleges that then-President Robert Mugabe strategically neutralised Chamisa’s ambitions by stripping his ministerial portfolio of key powers, such as control over the Postal and Telecommunications Regulatory Authority of Zimbabwe (Potraz), while simultaneously praising him as an exceptional minister.
According to Wafawarova, Chamisa’s relationship with the ruling party became more complex as he reportedly expressed admiration for Mugabe in private conversations, despite being a vocal opposition figure in public. He points to a leaked note from Chamisa to former ZANU-PF Minister Saviour Kasukuwere during a cabinet meeting, in which Chamisa allegedly extolled Mugabe’s leadership.
“Chamisa privately praised Mugabe as the best leader Zimbabwe has ever had, even as he led the opposition against him,” Wafawarova alleges.
🔴Just as The NewsHawks was thinking of promoting renewed open and candid debate on the role of main opposition leader Nelson Chamisa in Zimbabwe's dynamic and volatile politics, hugely by public demand, it came across this challenging and provocative opinion-editorial article by… pic.twitter.com/pVXf0iqISM
— TheNewsHawks (@NewsHawksLive) March 6, 2025
He further claims that Chamisa was at one point on the verge of aligning himself with the G40 faction of ZANU-PF, a development that prompted both MDC leader Morgan Tsvangirai and the Lacoste faction of ZANU-PF—aligned to current President Emmerson Mnangagwa—to take preemptive action to keep Chamisa within their sphere of influence.
“Mnangagwa’s camp wanted to prevent Chamisa from joining G40 at all costs. This is why Tsvangirai was advised to appoint Chamisa as one of the MDC’s three Vice Presidents in 2017,” Wafawarova asserts.
The political analyst also highlights concerns over Chamisa’s leadership style, citing Mavedzenge’s criteria for identifying a ‘captured’ opposition leader. These include undermining the organisational capacity of the opposition, avoiding direct confrontation with the ruling regime, and fostering a culture of intolerance towards intellectual debate.
“Chamisa disregarded the constitution in taking over the MDC Alliance and later forming the Citizens Coalition for Change (CCC) without a clear framework, leading to internal chaos. He also refrains from leading peaceful confrontations against Mnangagwa’s government, instead telling supporters to remain calm and seek spiritual guidance,” Wafawarova says.
Furthermore, Wafawarova points to Chamisa’s contentious relationships with various opposition figures, including Welshman Ncube, Tendai Biti, David Coltart, and Douglas Mwonzora, suggesting that his leadership has been marked by internal purges and factional struggles.
As debate around Chamisa’s role in Zimbabwe’s political future continues, these allegations raise questions about the opposition’s capacity to effectively challenge Mnangagwa’s administration. While Chamisa remains the most popular opposition leader in Zimbabwe, concerns over his political strategy and alleged compromises with the ruling elite are fueling discussions about the future of the opposition movement.
Whether Chamisa can navigate these challenges and reposition himself as a formidable contender for power remains a subject of intense debate within Zimbabwean political circles.
